Rhetorical Analysis Of Malcolm Xs The Ballot Or The Bullet

1964 was a presidential election year and Malcolm X a famous African American activist and member of Nation Of Islam gave a speech, â€Å"The Ballot or The Bullet† in Cleveland Ohio inside a methodist church. On how the people of color can use that election to an advantage to get what they have been fighting for. Using repetition, allusion, and a varied tone, Malcolm X pleads with people of color to stop trusting what the white people are promising and to educate themselves about who is actually with them and who would support them. Malcolm X most used line and famous in this speech, â€Å"the ballot or the bullet† he uses this wording to demonstrate the audience that they can either choose to vote or get killed. He is tired of seeing color of†¦show more content†¦He also alludes to Brother Lomax, â€Å"and now we have the type of black man on the scene in America today -- Im sorry, Brother Lomax -- who just doesnt intend to turn the other cheek any longer.† He is tired of the colored people getting used by the whites and for them to be ok with it. For the people to notice that he is being serious and is fed up he changes his tone throughout the speech. He offenses the people who voted for the candidate that sounded more promising, â€Å"Your vote, your dumb vote, your ignorant vote, your wasted vote put in an administration in Washington, D.C,† The people should educate themselves more so they can know who they can truly believe in and wont turn their backs on them. Later on he tries to influence them so they wont settle for something that they should have already had, â€Å"How can you thank a man for giving you whats already yours? How then can you thank him for giving you only part of whats already yours? You havent even made progress, if whats being given to you, you should have had already. Thats not progress.† The people of colorShow MoreRelatedRhetorical Analysis Of The Ballot Or The Bullet706 Words   |  3 PagesRhetorical Analysis: â€Å"The Ballot or the Bullet† by Malcolm X The 1960s were a tumultuous time in American history, where many Americans were rejecting the status quo, and advocating for the advancement of their rights. The feminist movement, Native Americans, Mexican Americans, and African Americans were all making noise and calling for change. Malcolm X, who at that point was mostly known through his work with the Nation of Islam, had had a falling out with the NOI, and after a pilgrimage to MeccaRead MoreRhetorical Analysis of Ballot or the Bullet Sppech by Malcolm X1359 Words   |  6 PagesAs one of the most proficient civil rights activist of the 1960s, Malcolm X and his speeches were very influential but particularly one speech was highly esteemed, that being the Ballot or the Bullet speech. A speech that was given after the I have A Dream speech by Dr. Martin Luther King. Despite, Dr. Martin Luther King being a pacifist and also a civil rights activist as well; Malcolm X was more tyrannical and advocated the use of violence. During thi s era, the democrats were in control of theRead MoreEssay on Rhetorical Analysis of Artifact: The Ballot or the Bullet2568 Words   |  11 PagesRhetorical Analysis of Artifact: The Ballot or the Bullet Speech Given by Malcolm X I. Introduction: Though almost half a century has passed, the Civil Rights Movement remains one freshly imprinted in not only the history books of US schools but also in the minds of countless Americans. Albeit, American society has come quite a ways in the acceptance of the individual - regardless of sex, age, creed or ethnicity - prejudices of different sorts are still to be foundRead MoreRhetorical Analysis of Malcolm X2503 Words   |  11 PagesChris Dennis Critical Analysis of Communication Malcolm X’s Effectiveness as a Speaker Should not be in Question The context in which a statement is made can change the entire meaning of what was said.   This is why many times people will use context as a defense for statements they make that offend or cause some sort of public backlash.    The manner in which a person delivers a message and what messages the rhetor chooses to deliver can be a great indication of foundation of thatRead MoreWhat does Tone have to do with it?1470 Words   |  6 Pagesto do with it? People learn rhetorical devices as soon as they can speak. Phrases like, â€Å"watch your tone,† â€Å"use your words,† â€Å"don’t guilt trip,† and many others are taught to children while they develop skills to communicate and disagree affectively. As people grow older, they become more adept at developing convincing arguments. The use of specific types of: tone, diction, and the pistes allow a rhetor to influence an audience. Two people that used these rhetorical devices to great effect wereRead MoreMalcom X And The Civil Rights Movement1105 Words   |  5 PagesFahad Algarni Ms. Kristi Brock ENG 101- College Writing (WC) 15 July 2015 Analysis of Ballot or Bullet On 3rd April 1964, Malcom X addressed the Negro community assembled in Cleveland over the controversial issue of the civil rights movement. â€Å"The Ballot or the Bullet† speech of Malcom X can be considered as a direct response to â€Å"I have a Dream† speech of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Malcom X and Dr. Martin were taking a stand for the true freedom of the same community but with a diagonally opposite

Caledonia Products Free Essays

Caledonia Products Integrative Problem 1. Why should Caledonia focus on project free cash flows as opposed to the accounting profits earned by the project when analyzing whether to undertake the project? Free cash flows are being focused on because it the amount that Caledonia will receive and they will be able to reinvest that amount. Caledonia should analyze the free cash flow so that they are able to see the real amount of value or what the cost may be. We will write a custom essay sample on Caledonia Products or any similar topic only for you Order Now The marginal value from the project would be in the incremental cash flow. The earnings would be much less if they were looking at it through the accounting profits. It would be less because of the depreciation would be considered an expense causing a larger expense for Caledonia. Describe factors Caledonia must consider if it were to lease versus buy First Caledonia must figure out if they will have enough cash flow to pay the bill each month. Leasing would give Caledonia the benefit of decreasing costs. The down side of leasing would mean that Caledonia will not be out of the lease until it has been paid off and the company who leased the property will be the owners until that is completed. Buying property means that the item is usually in better condition, better value, and they will own it. Prices are often better when buying than with leasing. Tax expenses may be a downside of owning the property. 2. Incremental Cash Flow Year1 Year2 Year3 Year4 Year5 Operating Cash Flow 5,949,200 9,909,200 11,493,200 6,741,200 3,771,200 Each year results in positive incremental cash flow and the new project appears to be a profitable business option. Accounting profits represent the total cost of doing business. The difference would be that this company requires additional net working capital every year which is not reflected in the incremental costs. 3. Initial Outlay Year 0 New Product Cost of new plant and equipment$(7,900,000) Shipping and installation costs (100,000) Total costs$(8,000,000) Initial working capital $(100,000) Initial cash flow (8,100,000) 4. Free Cash Flow Year0 Year1 Year2 Year3 Year4 Year 5 Project Revenues $21,000,000 $36,000,000 $42,000,000 $24,000,000 $15,600,000 Unit Costs (12,600,000) (21,600,000) (25,200,000) (14,400,000) (10,800,000) Gross Profit 8,400,000 14,400,000 16,800,000 9,600,000 4,800,000 Annual fixed costs (200,000) (200,000) (200,000) (200,000) (200,000) Depreciation (1,580,000) (1,580,000) (1,580,000) (1,580,000) (1,580,000) Net operating income 6,620,000 12,620,000 15,020,000 7,820,000 3,320,000 Taxes (34%) (2,250,800) (4,290,800) (5,106,800) (2,658,800) (1,128,800) NOPAT 4,369,200 8,329,200 9,913,200 5,161,200 2,191,200 Depreciation 1,580,000 1,580,000 1,580,000 1,580,000 1,580,000 Operating cash flow 5,949,200 9,909,200 11,493,200 6,741,200 3,771,200 Year0 Year1 Year2 Year3 Year4 Year5 Net Capital $(100,00) (2,100,000) (3,600,000) (4,200,000) (2,400,000) (1,560,000) CAPEX $(8,000,000) — —- —- — — Free Cash Flow $(8,100,000) 3,849,200 6,309,200 7,293,200 4,341,200 2,211,200 5. 6. 7. Should the project be accepted? Why or why not? Yes. This project should be accepted because the NPV ? 0. and the IRR ? required rate of return. Or No. This project should not be accepted because the NPV and the IRR required rate of return. How to cite Caledonia Products, Essay examples

Close Encounters Communication in Relationships

Question: Discuss about the Close Encounters for Communication in Relationships. Answer: Introduction: The primary goal of this research study is to assess the efficiency of married and unmarried couples. Both married and unmarried couples face issues regarding efficiency for which the below survey results were found. 50 couples, i.e. 100 people were involved in the survey so that the efficiency of Married couples vs. Unmarried ones can be assessed. Based on the scale, the couples were classified as efficient or inefficient. It is argued that communication has the ability to bring a couple closer or push them apart. According to the results in Figure 1, 85% of the people believe that after marriage, the communication has helped improve their efficiency. However, 15% of the respondents feel that there is more communication while the couple is unmarried. A majority of the married ones feel that it is easier to express and communicate as the married partners are good listeners. However, a small percentage of the unmarried ones stated that the partners made comments and put each other down. It is further argued that the partners need to have good listening skills and patience while withholding judgment and spending more energy on trying to understand. The unmarried couples were found more impulsive in nature that made it difficult for the partners to understand each other thereby increasing stress and reducing efficiency (Guerrero, Andersen, Afifi, 2013). It is argued that conflict is a natural and inevitable part of every human relationship. There are inevitable differences and it is necessary to handle such conflicts in a healthy manner. According to the results in Figure 2, 68% of the respondents believe that married couples handle conflict in a better way and find resolution. However, 32% of the respondents believe that the unmarried couples do not have a great way of handling conflict. The married couples stated that they are able to resolve the differences. In case of unmarried couples, the partner takes the disagreements seriously. It is argued that conflict must not be avoided as it damages a relationship. Building effective relationships affects efficiency in other aspects as it teaches the people to deal with the conflict rather than escaping from it (Worthington et al., 2015). Financial issues are one the most important concerns among the couples, whether married or unmarried. The partners often have disagreements when it is about monetary issues. However, it was found that 65% of the respondents felt that married couples manage their finances in a better way than the unmarried. The married couples have few concerns about debt and they know the proper amount to save. This is difficult in case of unmarried couples as they have low level of planning and 35% of the respondents feel that the same. The partners do not try to control the money in case of unmarried couples (Bisdee, Daly, Price, 2012). Couple flexibility refers to the level of changes and compromise can be made by the couple. It is important and challenging to adapt to the ever changing stress and challenges in the society. According to Figure 4, the couple flexibility among the married couples was more than the unmarried ones. 72% of the respondents believe that there is more flexibility and compromise among married couples that makes them efficient than the unmarried ones. It is argued that the unmarried couples do not make most decisions jointly. Therefore, 18% of the respondents believe that the unmarried couples are not able to adjust when necessary. It is argued that the relationships that do not balance well in times of compromise are inefficient. It is necessary to be adaptable in times of need. Also, the married ones were closer to their partners in comparison with the unmarried ones in terms of emotions (Busby, Larson, Halford, 2015). In terms of organization, it is found that married couples are more efficient than the unmarried ones. According to Figure 5, 80% of the respondents believe that the married ones are more organized. The things and plans are well-organized in comparison with the unmarried couples. 20% of the respondents believe that the unmarried couples are less organized and are haphazard in their ways in comparison with the married ones (Knudson-Martin, 2012). Therefore, the overall results indicate that the married couples are more efficient than the unmarried ones. There are ups and downs in the process, but the married ones prove to be greatly efficient than the unmarried couples. References Bisdee, D., Daly, T., Price, D. (2012). Behind Closed Doors: Older Couples and the Gendered Management of Household Money.Social Policy And Society,12(01), 163-174. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s147474641200053x Busby, D., Larson, J., Holman, T., Halford, W. (2015). Flexible Delivery Approaches to Couple Relationship Education: Predictors of Initial Engagement and Retention of Couples.Journal Of Child And Family Studies,24(10), 3018-3029. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0105-3 Guerrero, L., Andersen, P., Afifi, W. (2013).Close encounters: Communication in relationships(1st ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Knudson-Martin, C. (2012). Why Power Matters: Creating a Foundation of Mutual Support in Couple Relationships.Family Process,52(1), 5-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/famp.12011 Worthington, E., Berry, J., Hook, J., Davis, D., Scherer, M., Griffin, B. et al. (2015). Forgiveness-reconciliation and communication-conflict-resolution interventions versus retested controls in early married couples.Journal Of Counseling Psychology,62(1), 14-27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000045